Author Archives: Maven

About Maven

This guy is a real whizbang

Sanctions Pummel Neil Garfield Legal Theories

Neil Garfield’s frivolous filings and bogus legal theories have already cost at least one client, Zdislaw Maslanka, a wad of attorney fees in an utterly frivolous action to get his house free even though he remained current in his mortgage payments.  As the docket entries below show, the Florida 4th District appellate panel affirmed the […]

Read more

Jesinoski Loses in Trial Court, proving Neil Garfield WRONG

Garfield Wrong – Jesinoski Loses, Big Time Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 134 S. Ct. 1935 – Supreme Court 2014 JESINOSKI v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Dist. Court, Minnesota 2016 Neil Garfield and his minions and fellow incompetent “Lawyers who get it” across America have ballyhooed the January 2015 SCOTUS decision that Larry and […]

Read more

Legal Malpractice BOOMING in Foreclosure Defense Industry

Here’s a twist on legal malpractice and foreclosure that NOBODY but I wants to report. The Malpractice Scheme:  Hundreds if not THOUSANDS of attorneys around the USA, including prominent lawyers in YOUR CITY, vigorously promote their foreclosure defense services.  They get foreclosure victim clients by promising to “keep you in the house as long as possible.” […]

Read more

Fla Court Destroys Garfield Arguments in Maslanka

Maslanka could owe over $100K in his adversaries’ legal fees because his lawyer (Neil Garfield) propounded lunatic arguments in a lawsuit against a mortgage lender and creditor. If Maslanka gets a mortgage examination, he might have the evidence to prove that Garfield committed legal malpractice. Garfield is a total embarrassment to the legal profession; and […]

Read more

Garfield right for a change: Get a Mortgage Exam NOW

In his LivingLies Blog entry of 2016-04-27, Foreclosure Pretender Defender and Kool-Aid Drinker Neil Garfield wrote this, correct for a change: “… you need a thorough analysis of everything that happened with your alleged loan and a careful examination of the pleadings if you are already in court. We readily understand the reluctance to spend more […]

Read more

Saterback Opinion Destroys PSA/Assignment Arguments Post-Yvanova

I saw the California Yvanova case as much ado about nothing.  The borrower, Yvanova, sued for wrongful foreclosure because she discovered that the lender New Century Mortgage had, in bankruptcy, wrongfully assigned her note to a securitizer rather than allowing the bankruptcy liquidation trustee do it.  That meant the securitization trust had no rightful ownership of the […]

Read more

Memorize This Number If You Bought a Securitization Audit or Hired a Foreclosure Defender

Moving:  Such Fun! Call 800 444 6787 if you did any of these: Hired a foreclosure pretense defense lawer Bought a securitization audit Bought a chain of title audit Bought a loan audit It will connect you to Allied Van Lines after you LOSE YOUR HOUSE.  They can help move all your stuff when you […]

Read more

USDC Opinion DESTROYS Neil Garfield Legal Theories

The Tennessee western USDC denounced most if not all of the arguments Garfield made in his recent ridiculous postings on LivingLies blog. Jones v. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.,  Dist. Court, WD Tennessee 2016 – Google Scholar https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2270799973752803209&scilh=0 Here see just a few of Garfield’s idiotic postings: Down to the Nitty Gritty: Holder vs Owner of […]

Read more

Cal. Supremes Opine Yvanova May Sue on Void Assignment

Cal. Supremes Opine Yvanova May Sue on Void Assignment http://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/mainCaseScreen.cfm?dist=0&doc_id=2078551&doc_no=S218973 The Myth Mongers will come out in force saying this opinion means assignment snafus can void an otherwise perfectly just non-judicial foreclosure. In fact, it says that Yvanova may sue to undo a non-judicial foreclosure on the basis that the foreclosing party did not own beneficial […]

Read more

Proof that YOU can AFFORD a Mortgage Exam

Scammers of every stripe seem to crawl the nation looking for gullible home loan borrowers facing foreclosure, in order to sell them a worthless mortgage rescue service for gargantuan fees. And when those borrowers finally learn about Mortgage Attack, they have the gall to whine that they don’t have the money to pay for the […]

Read more

SCOTUS: Borrower Lacks Standing to Challenge PSA Violations

By Bob Hurt, 4 November 2015 Introduction The 2 November 2015 US Supreme Court denial of certiorari in Tran v Bank of New York settled once-and-for-all the spurious assertion that borrowers can challenge putative violations of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (PSA) creating a securitization trust. Borrowers, encouraged by Glaski v BOA, a California appellate […]

Read more

Mayer-Brown Whines about Brown v Quicken Loans Punitive Damage Award

In this article the author, from a law firm that specializes in beating up state courts for what the author considers excessive punitive damages awards, ATTACKED the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals for using procedural tricks to prevent the US Supreme Court from reviewing the award of $2.17 Million in punitive damages and $600K […]

Read more

The Vapor Money Theory

Courts across the land have trashed the Vapor Money Theory – the idea that the borrower’s note funded the loan, or there’s no real money and so the lender never actually gave money in the form of a loan.  I provide some court opinions, and a host of related citations. http://www.leagle.com/decision/In%20FDCO%2020100615B54/BARNES%20v.%20CITIGROUP%20INC. MICHAEL J. BARNES, Plaintiff(s), […]

Read more

Why Foreclosure Courts Want Proof that the Lender Injured the Borrower

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY v. Gardner, 2015 PA Super 219 – Pa: Superior Court 2015 https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5819170402171567967 In this TILA rescission appeal the court explained exactly why the borrower must tender in order to complete the rescission, and why the court has the power to rearrange the process, including the tender and lien removal sequence […]

Read more

Bradford Shows the Basics of Mortgage Attack in his own case

NORMAN BRADFORD SHOWS THAT THE COURTS LIKE RESCISSION and OTHER FORMS OF MORTGAGE ATTACK, etc, IF THE BORROWER ARTFULLY MANAGES THE ATTACK. If you want to see a case where the court denied rescission pre-Jesinoski, but the court awarded damages and attorney fees to the plaintiff, and where the MORTGAGE ATTACK lawsuit shows you how […]

Read more

Florida 1st District Affirms $250K Punitive Damage Award in Pate v BOA

All of you who simply cannot believe that borrowers can beat the bank by proving the bank and its agents and allies injured the borrower, TAKE HEART.  Here I present a crystal clear example of the MORTGAGE ATTACK methodology: Bank of America, NA v. Pate, 159 So. 3d 383 – Fla: Dist. Court of Appeals, […]

Read more